Observation ATLAS-GROUP102

Seven visual correspondences occupy one physical folio

Seven stronger catalogue correspondences used in the grouped-body proposal all target panels of physical folio 102. They are not seven independent physical units.

I compiled this story with the team (the AI agents I direct) from the versioned export below.

Research status and checks

Current status Eligibility closed; no scoring; proposal not restarted What this means

What was tested The selected stronger catalogue correspondences, not a newly scored visual-matching experiment.

What to look for, and why it matters

This open spread contains many plant parts. Several proposed matches come from panels of the same physical leaf. Counting them as separate pages would make the evidence seem broader than it is.

Yale's photograph of an open spread labelled 101v (part) and 102r: rows of small plant drawings on the left, and on the right two pages of plants and roots beside painted jars, with text between them — Yale's scan labelled 101v (part) and 102r. Rows of plant parts and containers share a foldout spread. Follow the linked catalogue comparisons to see which proposed matches belong to the same physical leaf. An unannotated context scan; the measurements are reported in the study below. Yale University, Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, MS 408. Public domain. Larger scan of 101v (part) and 102r at Yale

Where the correspondences sit

Physical folio 102: 7 correspondences, one leaf

Panel f102r1 (recto)

Fragment 203 resembles herbal folio f37v
Fragment 204 resembles herbal folio f1v

Panel f102r2 (recto)

Fragment 205 resembles herbal folio f47v
Fragment 206 resembles herbal folio f32v
Fragment 212 resembles herbal folio f18v
Fragment 213 resembles herbal folio f23r

Panel f102v1 (verso, not in the context image above)

Fragment 240 resembles herbal folio f19r

Grouped by the physical leaf they sit on. Each is a catalogue stronger resemblance, not identity proven. Proposed by René Zandbergen and Jorge Stolfi.

Other explanations

Weaker catalogue similarities are a different selection and cannot be silently pooled.

Limits

These are attributed visual judgments, not decoded names or confirmed species identifications. Eligibility closed without scoring.
The linked composite scan provides recto context only. The f102v1 correspondence is not illustrated by it; no panel boundaries or matching boxes are asserted.

How independent the evidence is

Transcriptions, catalogue entries and copied summaries are not independent confirmations. Repeated use of the manuscript and pipeline is shared evidence.

Connected items

Shares a source with Tested plant-label links remain unsupported, with a corrected evidence base Basis: Main research record: .inventory/registers/DECISIONS.md, line 92 (| D-086 |), sha256 9b0f6a628e53. Read the cited line

Sources and evidence

Catalogue Yale, Beinecke MS 408
Catalogue Zandbergen, pharmaceutical section catalogue
Published work Jorge Stolfi, Note 091: Repeated plant drawings

Credit Simone Systems Research: Jon directing AI-assisted research; retain original authors and run owners in the cited artifacts. Published plant-resemblance judgments are credited to René Zandbergen and Jorge Stolfi; the Atlas claims no plant identification.

Research records behind this card (3, 3 you can open)

Preserved supporting artifact lab:KNOWN_ANSWER_VISUAL_SEMANTIC_CONTROL_CHECKPOINT_2026-10-19.md; exact version is identified by its digest.

Governing correction or disposition: | D-086 |. This governs interpretation of earlier results.

Research workspace: KNOWN_ANSWER_VISUAL_SEMANTIC_CONTROL_CHECKPOINT_2026-10-19.md, line 527 (Read current primary catalogue), sha256 e537a5a39c48. Read the cited line
Research workspace: KNOWN_ANSWER_VISUAL_SEMANTIC_CONTROL_CHECKPOINT_2026-10-19.md, line 531 (Decision on proposed grouped-body bridge), sha256 e537a5a39c48. Read the cited line
Main research record: .inventory/registers/DECISIONS.md, line 92 (| D-086 |), sha256 9b0f6a628e53. Read the cited line

How to check it

Mode read-only source inspection; no experiment run by this package

Open the linked evidence copies or excerpts to check the cited wording and measurements. File details distinguish exact copies, path-normalized copies and excerpts, and retain source and copy hashes. Some cited files remain private and are marked as such. These selected evidence files are not a complete experiment-reproduction package: inputs, code and environment are not uniformly supplied. No experiment was rerun to prepare this export.

The files to read are the 3 research records listed under Sources and evidence; 3 of them can be opened there.

Cite and reuse this record

Cite this story

Simone Systems Research. “Seven visual correspondences occupy one physical folio.” Voynich Evidence Atlas, record ATLAS-GROUP102, export atlas-public-v1.0, 2026-10-19. https://simoneresearch.com/research/voynich/atlas/atlas-group102/

Report a correction to this story. Your email draft includes its public URL and record ID. Add the change you suggest and a supporting source.

This card is built from record ATLAS-GROUP102 in the export named below. The downloads contain the same record.

No redistribution license asserted for laboratory artifacts. Third-party content is linked, not bundled.